TL;DR:
Informal money transfer systems like Hawala, Hundi, Fei Chien, and Phei Kwan have existed for centuries, facilitating cross-border transactions without formal banking networks. Each system developed based on local trade, trust networks, and cultural traditions, addressing the need for efficient transfers in regions with limited banking infrastructure. Despite their practical benefits, these systems also pose regulatory challenges due to their undocumented nature.
Executive Summary:
Informal money transfer systems are networks that enable the movement of money across borders without passing through official banking channels. Systems like Hawala in the Middle East, Hundi in South Asia, Fei Chien in China, and Phei Kwan in Thailand rely on trust and reputation rather than legal contracts. These systems evolved to serve merchants, traders, migrant workers, and families in regions where formal financial infrastructure was either unavailable or costly. While they remain popular for their speed and low transaction costs, regulators are concerned about their potential misuse for money laundering and other illicit activities. This article explores the most well-known informal transfer systems, their origins, and how they operate.
List of Informal Money Transfer Systems and Their Origins
1. Hawala (Middle East, North Africa, South Asia)
- Origin: The word “Hawala” is derived from Arabic, meaning “transfer” or “trust.” It is one of the oldest systems of informal money transfer, dating back to at least the 8th century.
- Overview: Developed along trade routes in the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent, Hawala became a trusted way for merchants to move money across vast regions. It is still widely used for remittances, especially by migrant workers in the Gulf states.
- Unique Features: Based entirely on trust, transactions are settled within networks of Hawaladars with minimal or no documentation. This system bypasses formal banking and central bank oversight.
2. Hundi (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh)
- Origin: Hundi evolved from the Sanskrit word “hund” (meaning “to collect”), with roots in ancient India. It was traditionally used as a credit note or promissory note for trade purposes.
- Overview: Hundi was integral to trade in the Mughal era, allowing merchants to settle transactions without carrying cash. Today, it is still used informally in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh to transfer funds domestically and internationally.
- Unique Features: Like Hawala, Hundi operates based on trust. However, it often involves the issuance of paper notes or verbal commitments, acting as a promissory instrument.
3. Fei Chien (China)
- Origin: Fei Chien, meaning “flying money,” dates back to the Tang dynasty in ancient China. The term refers to the speed and ease of money transfers through trusted networks of merchants.
- Overview: Initially developed to avoid the risks of carrying cash over long trade routes, Fei Chien became a precursor to modern banking systems. It facilitated transfers between remote regions through a network of intermediaries.
- Unique Features: The focus on speed and discretion made Fei Chien a practical alternative to carrying physical money, especially in dangerous or rural areas.
4. Phei Kwan (Thailand, Myanmar, Laos)
- Origin: Phei Kwan is an informal transfer system used in Thailand, Myanmar, and Laos. Its origins are linked to regional trade along the Mekong River and migration patterns within Southeast Asia.
- Overview: Often used by migrant workers and small traders, Phei Kwan enables quick money transfers with minimal transaction costs. It remains a popular choice in remote areas with limited access to formal banking services.
- Unique Features: Transactions are carried out in cash, with trust-based relationships forming the backbone of the system.
5. Hawala-like Systems in Africa (Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia)
- Examples:
- Sudan: Hawala
- Somalia: Xawala or Hawala
- Ethiopia: Hawala
- Overview: These regions use systems similar to Hawala due to a lack of formal financial infrastructure. In Somalia, Xawala has become vital for remittances sent by the diaspora, who send money to family members back home through trusted networks.
- Unique Features: These systems help circumvent weak or unreliable banking sectors and are critical for remittances, despite posing significant AML risks.
6. Padala (Philippines)
- Origin: The term “Padala” means “to send” in Filipino. It evolved as a way for Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) to send remittances home.
- Overview: While most transactions are now carried out through formal channels, informal systems still exist, often facilitated by personal connections and couriers.
- Unique Features: Informal Padala networks can involve cash remittances sent via friends, family, or small courier businesses.
7. Hawala-like Systems in Latin America
- Examples:
- Encomienda (in colonial times, used for sending goods and money)
- Cundina (a form of collective savings system in Mexico)
- Overview: Although Latin America now relies primarily on formal remittance services, informal transfer systems persist in rural areas. In some regions, migrant workers use networks resembling Hawala to move money within the community.
- Unique Features: These systems are often embedded in social and cultural practices, with the emphasis on trust among community members.
8. Chit System (India, Sri Lanka)
- Origin: The Chit fund system, also known as Chitty, dates back several centuries in India. It involves a group of people contributing money to a common pool, which is distributed to members based on pre-agreed terms.
- Overview: While primarily used as a savings and credit tool, Chit funds can also serve as informal money transfer systems within closed networks.
- Unique Features: These systems blend savings, credit, and money transfer functions, with participants leveraging the collective pool of funds for personal or business needs.
Why Informal Money Transfer Systems Persist
These systems have persisted for centuries for several reasons:
- Lack of Banking Infrastructure: In many regions, formal banking services are either unavailable or difficult to access.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Informal networks often have lower fees than banks or international money transfer operators.
- Speed and Convenience: Transactions are completed quickly, without the delays associated with formal banking.
- Trust and Community Connections: These systems thrive on trust and reputation, making them effective in tight-knit communities.
Regulatory Challenges and Risks
While informal money transfer systems provide valuable services, they also raise several regulatory concerns:
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Risks: The lack of documentation makes it difficult to detect money laundering or terrorist financing.
- Tax Evasion: Informal networks enable individuals to move money without declaring it, leading to tax evasion.
- Lack of Consumer Protection: Participants have limited recourse if a transaction goes wrong.
- Global Security Risks: In some cases, these networks have been used to fund illegal activities, including terrorism.
Conclusion
Informal money transfer systems like Hawala, Hundi, and Fei Chien have deep roots in history, providing essential financial services where formal systems are lacking. While these networks offer speed, convenience, and cost-efficiency, they also pose significant risks for regulators trying to combat financial crime. Understanding these systems and their origins highlights the fine line between necessity and abuse in global financial flows.
Despite ongoing regulatory efforts to monitor and control these networks, informal money transfer systems are likely to persist as long as there are gaps in formal financial services. Their role in facilitating remittances, trade, and community-based savings ensures they remain relevant, even as financial ecosystems continue to evolve.
—
This page was last updated on December 2, 2024.
–