Confidential by defaultEstablished 201072 Jurisdictions

Merchant of Record (MoR)

The merchant of record is the legal seller in a transaction — the party named in the contract of sale and on the customer’s statement, and the one the chargeback and consumer obligations follow, whoever actually fulfills the order. It is a commercial description rather than a card-scheme term, and tax law does not always follow it.

Also called: merchant of record

Selling and fulfilling are separable. A software vendor can build a product while a reseller is the merchant of record for it; a creator can make a course that a platform sells in its own name. The merchant of record is whichever party contracts with the buyer. The phrase itself is commercial rather than technical — the card networks do not define it, and Visa’s rules define a merchant as an entity that accepts a card for the sale of goods or services, contracting with an acquirer directly or, through a payment facilitator, as a sponsored merchant — but the position it describes carries four things.

  • Tax — registering, charging the right rate, filing and remitting where the rules of the buyer’s country put the obligation. That is usually the contracting seller, but not always: under the EU’s deemed-supplier rule a platform that facilitates certain supplies through an electronic interface is treated as having bought and resold the goods itself, and accounts for the VAT whoever the contract names.
  • Disputes — the card acceptance is in its name, so chargebacks and refunds are its liability. Visa classifies an entity as a marketplace only where it is financially liable for disputes, and holds the acquirer answerable for that marketplace and its retailers.
  • Consumer obligations — terms of sale, cancellation and refund rights, complaint handling.
  • Scheme and acquirer compliance — the billing descriptor, prohibited-content rules, dispute ratios.

Businesses buy a merchant-of-record service to avoid exactly this: to sell into dozens of countries without registering for tax in each, holding acquiring relationships in each, and building the refund machinery. The provider buys from the vendor and sells to the customer, which is a real transfer of the seller’s position rather than a billing label. What the vendor gives up is the direct customer relationship and the data that comes with it, at a rate materially above card processing alone.

In practice

Being the merchant of record is a legal position, not a billing preference — but which obligations attach to it depends on the scheme rules and the tax law in play, not on the phrase itself, which the card networks do not define. Chargeback exposure does follow the seller’s position through the scheme chain. Tax does not follow automatically: in the EU a platform that facilitates supplies through an electronic interface can be deemed the supplier for VAT whatever the contract says. Have both checked for the markets the customers are actually in before agreeing to be, or to stop being, the merchant of record.

Example

A European software company sells worldwide through a merchant-of-record provider. The provider’s name appears on customers’ card statements, it charges and remits VAT in each buyer’s country, and it absorbs the chargebacks. It pays the software company a net amount each month. The software company has no direct contract with any of those customers.

Commonly confused with

TermHow it differs
Payment FacilitatorA facilitator enables sub-merchants to sell in their own names; a merchant of record sells in its own name instead of them.
Marketplace PaymentsMarketplace payments describe how money is collected and split; merchant of record answers the separate question of who legally sold to the buyer.

See also

← All glossary terms

Page Last Updated: 22/Sep/2026