Confidential by defaultEstablished 201072 Jurisdictions

Netting

Netting is offsetting mutual obligations so that only the difference actually moves. Two parties that have been paying each other all day settle one payment for the net amount, which cuts both the funds transferred and the liquidity each side must hold to support them.

Also called: netting off · net settlement

Two parties transacting with each other through the day accumulate obligations in both directions. Settling each one separately means moving the full value of every transaction and funding both sides of the flow. Netting replaces that with a single figure: total owed one way, minus total owed the other, paid once.

Bilateral netting covers two parties. Multilateral netting covers a group, with each member settling one net position against a central point rather than against every other member — the arrangement card schemes and automated clearing systems are built on. In a payment corridor, partners at either end commonly net a day’s or a week’s traffic instead of wiring each transaction as it arises.

What it buys, and what it costs

The gain is liquidity. Less cash has to be in the right place at the right time, which reduces what must be held on account or prefunded. The cost is exposure in between: from the moment the trades are done until the net payment arrives, each side is relying on the other to be good for its gross position. RTGS systems exist precisely because some payments are too large to carry that exposure at all.

In practice

Netting reduces the money that moves, not the obligations owed: until the net payment is made, each side is still exposed to the other for its full gross position. Whether the netting itself holds up if a counterparty fails depends on the governing law and on what the agreement actually says.

Example

Across a day, Partner A owes Partner B 3.0 million and B owes A 2.6 million over several hundred transactions. Settled gross, 5.6 million moves and both sides must fund their whole leg. Netted, one payment of 0.4 million goes from A to B. The other 5.2 million of obligations were still incurred, still had to be recorded, and still left each side exposed to the other until the 0.4 million landed.

Commonly confused with

TermHow it differs
SettlementNetting works out the single figure to be paid; settlement is that figure actually moving and the obligation being discharged.
RTGSAn RTGS system deliberately does the opposite — each payment settles individually and in full, removing the interim exposure that netting creates.

See also

Go deeper

← All glossary terms

Page Last Updated: 22/Sep/2026
Netting in Payments: How Net Settlement Really Works