Confidential by defaultEstablished 201072 Jurisdictions
FAQ · CryptocurrencyQ-74496991 min read

Has anyone actually been prosecuted over a “non-custodial” model?

The question in full

See how U.S. courts have prosecuted non-custodial payment services, confirming that custody is not required for money transmitter liability.

Answer
The founder assumes enforcement targets only exchanges and companies that hold customer funds.

Yes, and the results ended the debate. In United States v. Storm (S.D.N.Y.), the court held in September 2024 that a service can qualify as a money transmitter under 18 U.S.C. § 1960 regardless of whether its operators had custody of user funds; the jury convicted the Tornado Cash co-founder in August 2025. The Samourai Wallet founders pleaded guilty in July 2025 and received prison sentences of five and four years, with a $237M forfeiture — for a wallet where funds never left the users’ keys. BTC-e’s $110M penalty established that offshore incorporation while serving US customers changes nothing. Note also that operating without a required state license is a federal felony “whether or not the defendant knew that the operation was required to be licensed.” (18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(A), (C))

Faisal KhanAnswered 06/Aug/2026
Share
Page Last Updated: 06/Aug/2026 (7449699)