Our model indicates the fact of using crypto transactions in Asia only (not in the EU), and that instead of connecting user to user, we aim to connect merchants (in Asia) to users (in EU) and merchants (in EU) to users (in Asia). Is this model valid?

Under an RA model or any other model you choose, this is a valid model. You’re simply netting off and not sending funds across and using crypto for settlement. Perfectly allowed.

Suggested Video(s)

—

This page was last updated on February 6, 2023.

–

Related posts:

  1. We do not want to hide the fact that we are a crypto company in Asia; however, for EU, we understand crypto topics could be sensitive to most banks. Thus, we prefer to simply utilize the fiat transaction in EU (via an EMI license holder). Can you please tell us how we could be flexible in this case?
  2. Can you connect us with the MSB in Southeast Asia in order to act as the MTO in our models?
  3. As the Operator Led participant, we can open an EUR IBAN account for processing transactions (which means we can access/install a payment application (provided by the EMI holder) for sending/tracking transactions). So when a customer agrees to use our service, they will send EUR to our IBAN account, is it correct?
  4. Understanding Credit Funding Transactions (CFT) and Account Funding Transactions (AFT) in the World of Card Payments
  5. If we go for the Operator Led Model, are we qualified if we request to be connected to MSBs in Asia & other regions?
Share with others...