Consent Order

Definition

In the context of finance and regulatory compliance, a consent order is a legal agreement or decree between a financial institution and a regulatory body.

Here are three alternative definitions of a consent order from various legal sources:

1. According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, a consent order is “a decree or order made by a judge with the consent of all parties to a dispute. It is a voluntary agreement worked out between two or more parties, not strictly a judgment but rather a settlement agreement approved by the court. Consent orders are governed by federal and state laws, which vary by jurisdiction, and generally have the same effect as a court order, enforceable by the court if anyone does not comply”.
2. USLegal defines a consent order as “generally a voluntary agreement worked out between two or more parties to a dispute, governed by federal and state laws, which vary by jurisdiction. It has the same effect as a court order and can be enforced by the court if anyone does not comply with the orders”.
3. Wikipedia describes a consent decree, which is synonymous with a consent order in many contexts, as “an agreement or settlement that resolves a dispute between two parties without admission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case). It is a type of settlement that is most often used in the United States”.

These definitions highlight the nature of consent orders as agreements approved by a court, typically used to resolve disputes without the need for a trial, and enforceable by law if the terms are not adhered to.

Usage Context

Consent orders are used in various scenarios within the banking and financial industry, including but not limited to:

• Addressing compliance failures with banking regulations.
• Rectifying violations in money transfer operations.
• Correcting issues related to AML and Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures.
• Resolving problems with payment processing and card schemes.
• Adjusting practices in the trade and cryptocurrency sectors that are not in line with regulatory standards.

Importance

Consent orders are crucial in the financial sector for several reasons:

• Enforcement of Regulations: They ensure that financial institutions adhere to legal and regulatory frameworks, maintaining the integrity of the financial system.
• Consumer Protection: By enforcing compliance, they help protect consumers from unfair practices and potential financial harm.
• Risk Mitigation: For financial institutions, adhering to consent orders helps mitigate legal and reputational risks.
• Market Stability: They contribute to the overall stability and reliability of financial markets by ensuring that all participants follow established rules.

Users

The primary users or interactors with consent orders include:

• Regulatory Bodies: Such as the Federal Reserve, FDIC, SEC, CFTC, and state-level regulators, which issue and oversee the enforcement of these orders.
• Financial Institutions: Banks, credit unions, payment processors, card networks, money transfer services, and cryptocurrency platforms that must comply with these orders.
• Consumers: Indirectly affected as the implementation of consent orders ensures fair practices and protection of their interests.

Application

The application process of consent orders involves several key steps:

1. Identification of Violations: Regulators identify non-compliance issues through audits, inspections, or investigations.
2. Agreement on Terms: The regulatory body and the financial institution agree on the terms of the consent order, including corrective actions and deadlines.
3. Implementation: The institution implements the required changes, which may involve overhauling internal processes, enhancing compliance programs, or paying fines.
4. Monitoring and Reporting: The institution must often report progress to the regulator and may be subject to ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance.

Pros and Cons

Advantages:

• Avoids Litigation: Consent orders provide a way for financial institutions to resolve regulatory issues without facing court proceedings.
• Flexibility: They allow for negotiated terms, which can be tailored to the specific situation and needs of the institution.
• Prompt Resolution: Often leads to faster resolution of compliance issues compared to litigation.

Disadvantages:

• Costs: Implementing the required changes can be costly for institutions.
• Public Perception: The issuance of a consent order can negatively affect public perception of the institution.
• Operational Impact: Compliance efforts can divert resources from other areas of the institution’s operations.

Real-World Examples

1. Banking Sector: A major bank might receive a consent order for failing to implement effective AML practices. The order would require the bank to enhance its AML compliance program, conduct additional training, and perhaps pay a fine.
2. Cryptocurrency Exchange: A cryptocurrency exchange could be issued a consent order for not adhering to KYC regulations, necessitating an overhaul of its customer verification processes.
3. Payment Processors: A payment processor found not complying with consumer protection standards may be required to amend its dispute resolution processes and compensate affected customers.

Analogies

A consent order can be likened to a referee’s decision in a sports game where a team has broken the rules. Instead of disqualifying the team, the referee (regulator) issues a decision (consent order) that requires the team (financial institution) to correct their play according to the game’s rules (regulatory standards) to continue participating. This ensures the game (financial market) remains fair and enjoyable for all players and spectators (consumers and the broader economy).

—

This page was last updated on February 24, 2024.

–