Banksplaining

Banksplaining: When Banks Patronize Their Customers

What is Banksplaining?

Banksplaining is the act of condescendingly explaining banking products, policies, or issues to customers, assuming they lack the knowledge to understand the situation. It mirrors the behavior known as mansplaining, where a person (usually a man) explains something to another (often a woman) in an oversimplified or dismissive manner. In the case of banksplaining, the “man” is the bank, and the “woman” is the customer—even if that customer has expertise in finance or banking.

The term was coined by Faisal Khan, the CEO of Faisal Khan LLC, a global consultant in cross-border payments and banking. Khan often finds himself pointing out bugs, inefficiencies, and flaws in banking systems, only to receive patronizing responses from bank representatives. Despite his deep knowledge and experience in the sector, banks treat his valid critiques as though they come from an uninformed customer, exemplifying the essence of banksplaining.

How Does Banksplaining Manifest?

1. Customer Support Interactions

Banksplainers often deliver vague or oversimplified responses when customers ask about fees, errors, or delays.

Example: A customer questions a duplicate transaction, and the bank responds, “These things just happen sometimes, but don’t worry—our systems are safe.”

2. Product Explanations

When explaining loan terms or savings accounts, banks may assume customers can’t grasp the fine print, dismissing questions or concerns.

Example: A financial advisor might say, “This is a very complex loan product—you don’t need to worry about the details; just sign here.”

3. Handling Complaints or Errors

Banksplaining often occurs when customers report legitimate issues, such as bugs in online banking platforms, only to be met with dismissive explanations.

Example: When Faisal Khan reports a glitch in a payment system, the bank might reply, “Oh, that’s just how things work in banking systems,” without investigating the issue further.

4. Marketing Communication

Some promotional messages from banks assume that customers lack basic financial literacy, oversimplifying the benefits of their products.

Example: An ad for a savings account might say, “You’ll earn 1%—it’s free money!” without addressing hidden fees or inflation’s impact.

What Does Banksplaining Imply?

1. Power Imbalance

Banksplaining reflects the asymmetry of power and knowledge between financial institutions and their customers. It shows how banks leverage their expertise to control the narrative and dismiss concerns.

2. Lack of Transparency

By oversimplifying or dismissing legitimate questions, banks avoid accountability, masking flaws in their systems and discouraging further inquiries.

3. Discouragement of Financial Literacy

Rather than educating customers or empowering them to make informed financial decisions, banksplaining perpetuates financial dependence on the bank.

4. Frustration and Erosion of Trust

Dismissing legitimate feedback creates frustration among customers, leading to a loss of trust in financial institutions.

How to Recognize and Address Banksplaining

1. Promote Customer Empowerment

Banks can invest in financial literacy programs and offer transparent explanations to empower customers to make better decisions.

2. Improve Customer Service Practices

Banks need to train their representatives to communicate with empathy and respect, ensuring customers feel heard and valued.

3. Adopt Transparency Policies

Regulatory frameworks can push banks toward greater accountability, ensuring that customers receive clear, honest information about fees, loans, and other financial products.

4. Leverage Fintech Solutions

Fintech companies are already addressing customer frustration by providing more accessible and user-friendly alternatives to traditional banking. Banks must keep pace or risk losing customers to more transparent and responsive competitors.

Why Banksplaining Matters

Banksplaining is not just an inconvenience; it reveals systemic issues in the way financial institutions handle customer relationships and accountability. Dismissing legitimate feedback and discouraging inquiry fosters a toxic environment where customers are disempowered and reliant on opaque financial systems. The frustration caused by banksplaining may also push customers to seek alternative solutions from fintech providers, who often emphasize transparency and customer empowerment.

Conclusion: Banksplaining and the Future of Banking

Banksplaining, coined by Faisal Khan, encapsulates a common frustration with the way banks handle customer inquiries and feedback. By dismissing valid concerns with patronizing responses, banks widen the gap between customers and financial institutions. However, as financial literacy and fintech solutions grow, banks must adapt by becoming more transparent and responsive. Addressing banksplaining is not just about better communication—it’s about building trust and fostering a more equitable relationship with customers in an increasingly competitive financial landscape.

This article highlights banksplaining as an essential term to describe condescending behavior by banks, coined by Faisal Khan, a leading expert in the field of banking and payments.

This page was last updated on October 25, 2024.